1. The institution referred to in section 5.3 provides the following information:
(1) concerning the user:
(a) the name of the user’s mother;
(b) the reason for which the user’s health insurance number cannot be provided, where applicable;
(c) the date of death, where applicable;
(d) the address of the user’s permanent place of residence;
(e) the address and code of the municipality of the place where the user is staying, where applicable;
(2) concerning any identification of the user’s loss of autonomy using the tool Prisma-7:
(a) the care and service program and the centre or sub-centre of activities to which the identification is associated;
(b) the dates of beginning and end of the association of the identification with the centre or sub-centre of activities;
(c) the dates of beginning and end of the user’s participation in the care and service program;
(d) the sequential number assigned to the identification;
(e) the date on which identification began and the date on which it is completed;
(f) the result of the identification;
(g) the permit number of the institution where the identification was conducted;
(h) the number, on the institution’s permit, of the facility where the identification was conducted;
(3) concerning any assessment of the user’s loss of autonomy using the multi-clientele assessment tool (OEMC) or the functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) exclusively;
(a) the assessment model used;
(b) the care and service program and the centre or sub-centre of activities to which the assessment is associated;
(c) the dates of beginning and end of the association of the assessment with the centre or sub-centre of activities;
(d) the dates of beginning and end of the user’s participation in the care and service program;
(e) the sequential number assigned to the assessment;
(f) the date on which assessment began and the date on which it is completed;
(g) upon any provision of information, the history of the statements of realization of the assessment and the dates on which those statements of realization have changed;
(h) the result of the computation of the SMAF;
(i) the results of the computation of incapacity and handicap for each element of the SMAF;
(j) the type of resource-person who renders services to the user with respect to each element of the SMAF and an indication of the resource’s stability for each of those elements;
(k) the Iso-SMAF profile;
(l) the Euclidean distance;
(m) the employment title of the provider who conducted the assessment;
(n) the permit number of the institution where the assessment was conducted;
(o) the number, on the institution’s permit, of the facility where the assessment was carried out;
(4) concerning any individualized service plan or intervention plan established for the user and any new version of those plans:
(a) the type of plan;
(b) the care and service program and the centre or sub-centre of activities to which the plan is associated;
(c) the dates of beginning and end of the association of the plan with the centre or sub-centre of activities;
(d) the date of beginning and end of the user’s participation in the care and service program;
(e) the sequential number assigned to the plan;
(f) the version number;
(g) the goal of the plan;
(h) the date of creation of the plan version and the date on which it was completed;
(i) the date on which the plan was developed;
(j) upon any provision of information, the history of the statements of conduct of the plan and the dates on which those statements of conduct have changed;
(k) the means to be used and the interventions to be performed, identified on the plan, and the category to which they are related, their frequency, the day fixed for their implementation, their dates of beginning and end, the time allocated to them, the place where they are implemented or performed, the type of provider assigned to them, the centre and sub-centre of activities to which they are associated at the time of planning, the identity of their provider, and the link between the provider and the user, where applicable;
(l) the date of any revision of the plan;
(m) the degree of achievement of the objectives per type of act;
(n) the degree of acceptance of the plan by the user;
(o) the employment title of the provider in charge of the plan;
(p) a mention that the case was assigned to a case manager or a pivotal provider and the dates of beginning and end of the assignment of the case to any case manager or pivotal provider;
(q) the permit number of the institution where the plan was carried out;
(r) the number, on the institution’s permit, of the facility where the plan was carried out;
(5) concerning any transmission of information to the Minister:
(a) the permit number of the institution from which the data is provided;
(b) the code of the health region from which the information originates;
(c) the date of transmission;
(d) the number assigned to the transmission;
(e) the dates on which the period concerned begins and ends.